Archive for October, 2008

Common Law

Friday, October 31st, 2008

Common Law is judge made law where courts create law where there is no present legal authority in the statutes or prior case law.  Judges have the legal authority to create law by making precedent.  Precedent is derived from common law and binds future decisions.  When parties disagree on what the actual law is during a case, a common law court will look to past precedent of relevant court authority to rule on that issue.  If a matter of dispute is unique from previous cases, it will be decided as a matter of first impression.  Courts are very careful in crafting new laws and usually seek to avoid the issue if the materiality of the case does not hinge on the issue.  This is common in Supreme Court cases where the justices will ignore an issue that is not necessary to decide the case.

Internet Legal Research

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Westlaw and Lexisnexis provide premium legal research online.  You can easily search thousands of cases using citations or party names.  Federal and state decisions are also available.  As technology advances, many options are becoming available.  These legal sites also make it easier to find relevant cases and cut back time searching in book form because links are made directly available from case to case.  Westlaw even has a natural keyword language search tool where you can naturally search language pertaining to your case.  Besides case law, these two legal search engines provide scholarly journals and authority references.  Help your case by searching the law online.

Judicial Inconsistency

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

Discretion within the courts has both positive and negative consequences.  First, discretion gives judges the ability to better handle circumstances on a case by case basis rather than adhering to hardline black letter law that may not properly address a situation at hand.  It, in a sense, invokes more common sense into the law.  However, the cons hold heavy weight.  First, this gives rise to judicial inconsistency in different courts on the same issue and sometimes even the same courts hold different ways.  Thus, a plaintiff may “win” in one state and “lose” in another.  Following, judges personal bias and thinking is intermixed in case law.  This is a largely unwanted consequence.  Ideally, laws would be mostly uniform across sovereign territories and not be influenced by a judges whim.  The study and application of law is no easy task, but I believe legislatures can improve upon the existing legal structure.

Criminal Law Theories

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

There is much debate over whether our current criminal law system is more beneficial than other criminal law systems.  There are 5 primary reasons for our criminal systems within the world.  One is retribution.  The thinking here is that those who have done wrong should suffer in some way because others and/or the community on a whole have suffered in some way.  Also, deterrence is another objective of the penal system.  The idea is that the penalty suffered will deter others from behaving criminally.  You constantly see law makers trying to size up whether current penalties are tough enough in relation to the behavior they are believed to thwart.  Prison systems are set up for incapacitation.  This is to keep the wrong doers away from society as their misconduct is a detriment to us all.  Rehabilitation is what we strive for.  The goal is prevention by way of education and individual learning process.  Lastly, there is retribution which is where the victim is compensated for their loss or harm suffered.  This is common in civil law as well.  Criminal defense attorneys often argue that punishments are too harsh for many crimes.

Only Legal Information

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

Welcome to Oliquig, a legal information and blogging site typing up daily news and notes.  This site covers all realms of the justice system.  Criminal law, torts, contracts, personal injury, insurance law, environmental law, and many more.  The legal world is now moving into the technological age and it is mostly for the better.  For example, courtrooms are using far less paper as they quickly integrate into a paperless system.  Also, discovery has become easier in most cases as computers can scan documents quickly for keywords being searched for.  However, on this token much more information has become discoverable such as attorney hard drives and emails.  It is now a question whether office emails are even privileged despite any legal disclaimer attached to the bottom.  Furthermore, technology has made contracts easier and more efficient.  Clients from all over the world can connect and bind themselves in a matter of seconds.  Although it should be noted the enforcement of these contracts can become a mess between jurisdictions and different laws.