<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Blog &#187; Civil Procedure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliquig.com/category/civil-procedure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliquig.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 01:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Legal Information</title>
		<link>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/legal-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/legal-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oliquig.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plea to the Jurisdiction &#8211; The proper direct attack for want of subject matter jurisdiction is a &#8220;plea to the jurisdiction,&#8221; not a &#8220;motion to dismiss&#8221; as in federal court.  A motion for summary judgment may also be used to raise a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  Plaintiff can appeal from a trial court&#8217;s determination [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plea to the Jurisdiction &#8211; The proper direct attack for want of subject matter jurisdiction is a &#8220;plea to the jurisdiction,&#8221; not a &#8220;motion to dismiss&#8221; as in federal court.  A motion for summary judgment may also be used to raise a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  Plaintiff can appeal from a trial court&#8217;s determination of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the resultant dismissal and, if successful, the appellate court will remand for a full trial.  If however, the tiral court erroneously asserts jurisdiction, defendant&#8217;s only remedy is an appeal after final judgment.</p>
<p>No waiver &#8211; Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived.  It can be raised on the first time in appeal.  A court without jurisdiction may not transfer the case, but can only dismiss so that the case can be refiled.  Subject matter jurisdiction is not limited to the amount in controversy.  A court lacks SMJ when the plaintiff lacks standing, when the suit is not yet rip for decision, and when the defendant is immune from suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/legal-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zones of Evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/zones-of-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/zones-of-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oliquig.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas civil procedure law features 5 zones of evidence.  Zone 1 is no evidence or only a scintilla of evidence while zone 5 is conclusive evidence.  Both enable a court to issue summary judgment.
Zone 1 &#8211; No evidence.  Did the movant in a sj that the person with BOP has no evidence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas civil procedure law features 5 zones of evidence.  Zone 1 is no evidence or only a scintilla of evidence while zone 5 is conclusive evidence.  Both enable a court to issue summary judgment.</p>
<p>Zone 1 &#8211; No evidence.  Did the movant in a sj that the person with BOP has no evidence or no duty? Generally, this means there will be a judgment for the non-movant. Ex P has burden and sues but trial court has no evidence, judgment for D</p>
<p>Zone 5 &#8211; Conclusive evidence.  P comes in with conclusive evidence and if trial court agrees they enter in a judgment for the person with the burden</p>
<p>Zone 2 &#8211; Insufficient evidence &#8211; some evidence but not enough to support a judgment for the person with the bop. Remedy here is new trial if there was actually some evidence on appeal. 2 or above so it gets to go to jury. If jury finds for the P. Then the other side comes in and says there was insufficient evidence to support a judgment for P. If judge agrees, grants a new trial.</p>
<p>Zone 3 &#8211; Jury will not be reversed.</p>
<p>Zone 4 &#8211; Great weight of preponderance. The jury finds against the person with the BOP. Really what they&#8217;re saying is there is no or insufficient evidence. P argues that this case is really a 4 or 5. You have to ignore jury&#8217;s verdict, you have to enter a judgment for me. If judge finds the verdict is against weight of evidence, then can order a new trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliquig.com/civil-procedure/zones-of-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
