A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his conduct or to circumstances surrounding his conduct when he is aware of the nature of his conduct or that the circumstances exist. A person acts with knowledge with respect to a result of his conduct when he is aware that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result. In State vs. Beale, a subjective test for knowledge offered that it was not enough that a reasonable person would know, Beale himself must have known that the merchandise was stolen. The court said this was the test for criminal liability. This is not the rule in every jurisdiciton. The true test for knowledge was to ask did the defendant in this case know the goods were stolen? Direct proof was not required. It is enough if Defendant is made aware of circumstances which caused him to believe that the goods were stolen. The court was concerned with the defendant’s conduct and whether it evidenced showing awareness.